Our publishing standard
This policy sets the standard for our upcoming reviews and guides. Before publication, each article should identify its author, publication and update dates, research scope, sources, and material commercial relationships.
Start with the source
We will use manufacturer documentation for product specifications and seller terms, clearly identifying them as manufacturer or seller information. Where relevant, we will seek independent primary sources. A marketing claim is not proof that a product works.
Evaluate the whole decision
Our planned review framework considers the evidence behind claims, disclosed specifications or ingredients, total advertised cost, recurring charges, return conditions, and practical limitations. Prices and policies can change; readers should confirm them with the seller.
Explain what we did
We do not claim hands-on or laboratory testing. Research-based articles must be labeled and distinguish documented facts, manufacturer statements, and editorial interpretation. If physical testing is introduced later, the relevant article must describe what was tested and how.
Keep commercial relationships visible
Affiliate relationships must be disclosed clearly near relevant recommendations or purchase links. We do not sell favorable conclusions. Sponsored content, if introduced, must be labeled, and brands may not purchase editorial rankings.
Handle health topics carefully
Health-related content is for general information and is not individualized medical advice. Reviews must not present a supplement as a treatment or guarantee outcomes. Evidence about an ingredient does not automatically establish the effects of a finished product.
Corrections and updates
Material corrections should be noted on the affected article, with its update date. Readers will be able to report inaccuracies through our Contact page once our public contact channel is available.
Clarity starts with context.
Explore our editorial standards →